The terms "liberal and conservative" have been tossed around for so long that neither has much appeal. "Liberals" are associated with socialistic policies, and loosely held moral standards. The conservative aspect is often seen as aligned with elitism, bigotry and hate. Neither of these characterizations are complete or entirely accurate.They do, however, make it easy for the average person to "pick a side". "Side-picking" is what it is all about, isn't it?
The reality is that people are busy. They don't have the time to delve deeply into issues and policies, even though they are directly or indirectly affected. Hence, the need for simplistic characterizations, such as, liberal and conservative.
Recently, the passage of RFRA, in the state of Indiana, created a massive stir. Huge names in business, politics, and entertainment pushed back hard on this "conservative" policy. Governor Pence and Indiana's state legislative bodies, in the end, were forced to modify RFRA.
Conservatives lead with cries for religious freedom, while liberals countered with the need for anti-discrimination protections for LBGT persons. Pressure was applied and conservatives gave ground.
At heart, both sides simply want respect. People of faith want to live their faith in accordance with their beliefs. LGBT people want to be viewed as equals and treated fairly at work, at play, and at worship.
Last night, I attended a Town Hall event intended to clarify RFRA and continue to mobilize LGBT citizens to participate in their government. As I looked around the room, I saw and heard many intelligent people express their desire and hope for equity in all aspects of their lives.
I also discovered my injuries and personal pain from years of living a less than authentic life. Then, I multiplied my pain by thousands. I discovered the exponential pain of the LGBT citizens of our world. I wanted to run to the shadows, hidden from your view. I also wanted to stand up and be recognized. Big things are really never simple.
As we legislate in our country, our states, and our communities, let's weigh the cost of any law in measure of the human pain it will procure. Are the benefits grounded in equity? Do the benefits outweigh the human cost?
Of course this is a much more difficult course to take. It is far easier to continue to see ourselves as simply "liberals" and "conservatives" and make all of our decisions based on these shallow measures.
